timg
邵允黎
  邵允黎 相關圖片
其他人物 :

邵允黎 生平 :

2013年8月3日到天安門金水橋撒傳單後被天安門分局帶走後刑事拘留。9月12日,被北京市朝陽區公安分局以「尋釁滋事罪」逮捕,現羈押在北京市東城看守所。
 

江蘇 邵允黎天安門撒傳單遭北京警方逮捕

【天網北京訊2013-09-12】今天下午18時,河北省保定市高碑店市訪民李風華致電中國天網人權事務中心:蘇州 邵允黎天安門撒傳單遭北京警方逮捕。

來電稱,江蘇蘇州 邵允黎因為前往天安門撒傳單30天前遭刑事拘留後【江蘇河南黑龍江訪民天安門鳴冤被擒】,今天下午16時30分,正在南京的 邵允黎家屬收到北京市朝陽區公安分局逮捕通知書。稱已經遭逮捕。

今晚22時25分,李風華再次來電:據知情人介紹,8月3日上午11時許, 邵允黎、河南王群鳳前往金水橋鳴冤撒材料時,隨身還攜帶了汽油,致使 邵允黎被以尋釁滋事罪逮捕,現羈押在北京市東城看守所。

http://www.64tianwang.com/bencandy.php?fid=6&aid=14548


2013年8月6日

江蘇 邵允黎天安門撒傳單被刑事拘留(圖)

(維權網資訊員田靜民報導)8月3日,江蘇 邵允黎、山西王群鳳、黑龍江初東芳等人到金水橋撒傳單, 邵允黎當場被天安門分局帶走,後傳出她已被刑事拘留,因 邵允黎的電話一直不通,目前尚不知道關押在那個看守所,也不清楚刑拘的罪名。
 
 邵允黎是因為上大學生的兒子和女友同居,被以強姦罪判處有期徒刑三年六個月。對此判決 邵允黎和兒子均都不服上訴,再審程式走到最高法院,終於立案了。可等來的卻是最高法院立案庭的通知書。即《(2009)刑監字第199號》通知書。 邵允黎說:“這不是判決書、裁定書,不是審理結果,沒有法律效力。最高檢察院不受理我們當事人抗訴申請,最高法院剝奪了我們向最高檢察院申請抗訴的權利。最高法院立案庭通知書違法。” 邵允黎還說:“我們是向最高法院申請再審,立案庭下達通知書,並蓋有立案庭的章純屬違法,最高法院的公章呢?最高法院在違法!” 
 
 邵允黎多年上訪無果,走投無路到天安門撒傳單,被天安門分局抓去刑事拘留,但親屬至今未收到任何法律文書,其親友請求社會各界關注。
 
http://wqw2010.blogspot.hk/2013/08/blog-post_6.html

2013年5月10日星期五

江蘇 邵允黎新華門撒傳單被拘留(圖)

(維權網資訊員唐韻報導)5月8日,江蘇上訪維權人士 邵允黎在北京新華門-中南海一帶撒傳單時,被府右街派出所拘留。
 
 邵允黎的兒子是某高校的大學生,因與同窗女友同居被以強姦罪判處有期徒刑3年半入獄。為了給兒子討回公道 邵允黎走了九個年頭的上訪維權之路。其中被多次拘留,被黑監獄。 邵允黎認為,案件存在諸多違法之處:
 
一、本案程式違法:1、被告沒有收到公安機關立案通知書;2、嚴重超期關押。2004年6月19日我兒被南京公安員警在旅社抓走到2005年4月15日南京鼓樓區法院一審判三年半;3、法院開庭原告、證人都沒有到庭當庭質證的情況下就判了強姦罪。
     
二、江蘇省南京一審二審法院對本案定性錯誤。
早在1984年4月26日最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院、公安部關於當前辦理強姦案件中具體應用法律的諾幹問題的解答。法研字第7號第三條。1、把強姦同未婚男女在戀愛過程中自願發生的不正當性行為加以區別……2、把強姦與通姦加以區別……本案有情書、人流證明作證。
 
三、本案定罪量刑的事實沒有證據證明庭審中原告告被告暴力強姦4次,未出示暴力法醫傷情鑒定結論來證明,法律是講證據的。
 
 邵允黎曾於2011年3月13日在天安門遊玩,被以非法上訪為由被常熟地 方政府行政拘留我13天,期間被帶手銬腳鐐。
 
由於無法聯繫到 邵允黎本人,她被行政拘留的依據和拘留期限、目前被關押何處尚不明確。
 
http://wqw2010.blogspot.hk/2013/05/blog-post_8015.html

常熟市 邵允黎為兒伸冤被關押黑監獄的證據

(博訊北京時間2012年8月30日 首發)
常熟市 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤被关押黑监狱的证据
    江蘇省常熟市 邵允黎為大學生兒子做冤獄,來北京上訪被北京安元鼎黑保安關押(安元鼎已經被取締)到北京公安報案。卻被當地截訪回常熟市。為此常熟市正式發文將 邵允黎再次關進“法教班”為名的黑監獄。
    
     邵允黎為兒冤獄上訪,在北京遭安元鼎黑監獄關押,回當地政府正式發文關黑監獄。如今, 邵允黎因屢屢關進黑監獄島北京找中央政法委。 邵允黎打橫幅;質問中央地方為什麼公開建立黑監獄關押訪民,沒人管!,政法委下無法治!
常熟市 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤被关押黑监狱的证据
 
常熟市 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤被关押黑监狱的证据
    2010年北京公安接 邵允黎指控安元鼎的接案回執
常熟市 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤被关押黑监狱的证据
 
常熟市 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤被关押黑监狱的证据
    2012年 邵允黎在南站訪民7,1党慶集會上質問政法委
http://boxun.com/news/gb/china/2012/08/201208300337.shtml
 

大學生同居判強姦 母親 邵允黎為兒伸冤(中、英文)

(博訊北京時間2011年9月18日 首發)
    江蘇常孰市 邵允黎兒子陳曉峰在南京醫科大學讀書期間談戀愛。並與女朋友同居,女朋友還做工流產。只因二人吵架,南京公,檢、法在受理女方控告。有司法腐敗,不顧客觀事實,把陳曉峰定為強姦。毀了一個青年大好前程。凸顯南京司法不公的案例/
大学生同居判强奸 母亲 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤
    大學生同居判強姦 母親 邵允黎為兒伸冤
 
    上書人: 邵允黎,為兒子的不白之冤代為上書。身份證號:320520195703140027,帶著滿身的傷痕,破碎的心。向你們訴說我家的遭遇和冤情。
    難忘的2004年6月19日,造成我家至今蒙冤屈辱,推進萬丈深淵,天哪!我該怎麼辦?我是江蘇常熟人,膝下唯有一子陳曉鋒,2002年考入南京醫科大學就讀,後與同窗女友朱麗嵐戀愛兩年。其間我兒曾攜物件回家探親,徵求我們家長意見,他們小倆口出雙入對、如膠似漆校內任人皆知,因尚未畢業還人流兩次我們家為他們的婚事付過四萬元彩禮,不料日後朱麗嵐另覓新歡,欲與我兒分手,又怕背上喜新厭舊忘恩負義之惡名,受人教唆,竟誣告我兒強姦與她。南京公安不分是非,將我兒送上被告席,南京法院也不作分析,于常理而不顧,以強姦罪判我兒有期徒刑三年半,我呼天搶地但於事無補,我不服,這也能叫“強姦”?想天下女子第一次遇事,無不半推半就,這也叫強姦,這滿世界的男人豈不都是強姦犯了嗎?
    請中央各位首長關注這一起駭人聽聞、弄假成真強姦案,還是人情案。
    一、 江蘇省南京一審二審法院對本案定性錯誤。
    早在1984年4月26日最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院、公安部關於當前辦理強姦案件中具體應用法律的諾幹問題的解答。法研字第7號第三條。1、把強姦同未婚男女在戀愛過程中自願發生的不正當性行為加以區別……2、把強姦與通姦加以區別……本案有情書、人流證明作證。
    二、 本案程式違法
    1、 被告沒有收到公安機關立案通知書。
    2、 嚴重超期關押。2004年6月19日我兒被南京公安員警在旅社抓走到2005年4月15日南京鼓樓區法院一審判三年半。
    3、 法院開庭原告、證人都沒有到庭當庭質證的情況下就判了強姦罪
    三、 本案定罪量刑的事實沒有證據證明
    庭審中原告告被告暴力強姦4次,未出示暴力法醫傷情鑒定結論來證明,法律是講證據的。
    四、 本案證據不充分
    公訴機關沒有提交對證明陳曉鋒無罪的相關證據包括偵查機關對陳曉鋒測謊的結論,被告人親屬與受害人達成的調解協定,朱麗嵐在省婦幼保健醫院的婦科檢查結果。法院在事實不清、證據不足、程式違法、使用法律錯誤的情況下稀裡糊塗判了強姦罪,害人那!
    8年上訪路,辛酸苦辣說不清。主席、總理、各位常委部長合法訴求路在哪裡?法院上下包庇,8次判決駁回,維持原判,請求關注一下,指令職能部門立案再審。我家的個案其實是目前民生狀況的一個縮影。8年了,上訴、申訴、申請再審遙遙無期的苦等,流浪在京。我兒才二十幾歲,以後的路還很長,讓他背著“強姦”犯這個不該背的黑鍋走下去,我們兩代人真承受不了。我恨,恨司法腐敗造成我兒現無學業、無工作、無婚姻,為討公道,我多次拘留關進牢房、非法拘禁、非法綁架、非法押送、封閉式管理教育,對我身心迫害,精神受到極大傷害和折磨。我和丈夫現已滿頭白髮的老人,一身病,特別是我倆的心臟病,2009年12月4日駐京辦非法拘禁我,心臟病復發我打急救電話二十幾個110、120、999請求幫助,都被駐京辦擋住不讓救治,幸虧我身上還有最後一粒救心丸,才免於一死。2011年3月13日我在天安門遊玩,他們捏造事實以非法上訪為理由在常熟非法拘留我13天,按犯罪嫌疑人對待,手銬腳鐐,用法西斯的手段對待一個合法上訪者,上訪者成了專政物件,沒有人權和尊嚴,和諧社會依法治國怎麼體現?還用勞動教養2年來威脅恐嚇我,他們無法無天、懲善揚惡、以邪壓正,尊嚴之聖潔。何日天才明。滿清皇朝楊乃武尚能蒙冤昭雪,法治中國陳曉鋒遭陷定遇青天。我被逼進京,雖苦猶榮。如果我在這條路上真被迫害滅口,我也為反司法腐敗做了鋪路石。
    呈:中央各位首長
    
     上書人: 邵允黎
     2011年7月28日
    大學生同居判強姦 母親 邵允黎為兒伸冤
大学生同居判强奸 母亲 <a href='content.php?pid=2547' class='screenshot' rel='http://www.64wiki.com/viiv/uploads/th_13774211695876.jpg' title='邵允黎'><img src='images/phototag.png' align=absmiddle >邵允黎</a>为儿伸冤
 
    以下是 邵允黎用英文寫下的上訴書
    Honorable President Hu Jintao, Premier Wen Jiabao, members of standing committee and ministers, 
    
    Holder: Shao Yunli. I write this for unredressed injustice of my son. ID Card No.: 320520195703140027. Please allow me to tell the tragic experience incurred in my house, with cuts and bruises and a broken heart.
    I will never forget June 19, 2004, when my family fell into the abyss with unredressed injustice. God! What should I do? I was born in Changshu, Jiangsu province. I have a son named Chen Xiaofeng, who was enrolled in Nanjing Medical University in 2002. He had a girlfriend named Zhu Lilan in university and they had been together for 2 years. They once came home together to ask for our advice. Everybody in university knew how deeply they were attached with each other. They had done artificial abortion twice in university. Our family had given RMB40, 000 Yuan as betrothal gift to Zhu Lilan’s family only to find she found another new and wanted to break up with my son. And the most excessive was she lodged a false accusation against my son for rape because she feared to be said to love the new and loath the old with an ungrateful heart. Nanjing Public Security sent my son to the dock and Nanjing Court sentenced him to 3 years for rape without analysis. I screamed in pain but it did not help. I cannot accept it; can we call it “rape”? Just think about the girls make love for the first time, who often yield with a show of reluctance. If this is called rape, all men in the world are rapists.
    Please consider this shocking case in which pretence becomes reality, which also 
    involves social relationships.
    I Nanjing Court in Jiangsu made mistakes in characterizing this case in the first and second instance. Supreme People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate and Ministry of Public Security had explained questions for detailed applied laws during dealing with rape cases. In Article 3 of F.Y.Zi No. 7, it says a) differentiate rape from voluntary misconduct sexual relations in affection; b) differentiate rape from adultery. I have love letters and artificial abortion certificate as evidence. 
    II The procedures of case were illegal.
    1. The defendant had not received filling notice from public security.
    2. Extended detention. My son was detented from June 19, 2004 when he was caught in a hotel by Nanjing Public Security to April 15, 2005 when he was sentenced to 3 years and a half in the first instance by Nanjing Gulou District Court.
    3. My son was sentenced for rape without plaintiffs and witnesses appearing in the court.
    III No evidence for measurement of penalty
    Plaintiff charged against my son for raping her for 4 times, but there was no Forensic Identification of Injury. They need evidence according to law.
    IV The evidence was not sufficient
    Public security organ had not submitted related evidence of innocence for my son, such as lie test result of criminal investigation organ, mediation agreement between relatives of defendant and victims, gynecological examination results of Zhu Lilan in Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital. The court sentenced my son for rape without knowing truth, sufficient evidence, legal procedures and correct applied laws. 
    There are so many bitters in 8 years of appealing to the higher authorities for help. Mr. President, Premier, members of standing committee and ministers, tell me where is the way out? There is covering up in the court, which rejected my request for 8 times and maintained the original sentence. I beg for retrial. My private case is an epitome of current livelihood in our country. I appealed and waited repeatedly in Peking for 8 years. My son is just over 20, and he has long life to live. I cannot stand that he lives as a “rapist” which is a burden he should not carry. I hate judicial corruption which leads to that my son has no certificate, job and marriage. To fight for fair, I have been detained, imprisoned, kidnapped, sent under escort and managed closely for education for many times. I have been persecuted mentally and physically. My husband and I are old with white hair, many illnesses and especially our disease. On December 4, 2009, Beijing Office imprisoned me illegally, which caused my heart attack. I dialed 110, 120, 999 for over 20 times for help, but they stopped me and fortunately, I survived with the last grain of medicine. On March 13, 2011, I visited in Tian An Men Square, but they detained me in Changshu for 13 days with excuse of illegal appealing. I was treated as a suspect with handcuffs and leg irons. They treated me and ignored my dignity and human rights, how can we realize the goal of running state according to law? They should threaten that they would reeducate me for 2 years! They were so lawless, pressed fair with evil; I want to ask when will the dignity stand up? Yang Naiwu was rehabilitated in Tang Dynasty, I believe my son will surely find justice in a country ruled according to law. I was forced to stay in Peking, but it is ok. If I really killed for this, I am happy to be a pavestone for fighting against judicial corruption.
    To top officials of Chinese Central Government
    Writer: Shao Yunli, Jiangsu, China
    July 28, 2011 [博訊首發,轉載請注明出處]
http://boxun.com/news/gb/china/2011/09/201109180822.shtml
 

 

[Visit: 1355]
Tags : | | | | |

相關文章: 共 0 篇

<< 李鐵金安迪>>
© 2012 64wiki 支持我們 | 關於我們 | 聯絡我們